Analysis: “~80% improvement in education processes from 2024 to 2025”
Purpose: To assess quantitatively and qualitatively the progress made in 2025 in education processes by institutions (schools, colleges, course centres, etc.) that began using Bilsa Okulsis and other Bilsa modules in 2024.
Scope: This report examines improvements in efficiency, academic performance, administrative processes and user satisfaction that Bilsa enables for institutions.
Institution profile: The analysis is based on 72 institutions that actively rolled out Bilsa in 2024. (This cohort was treated as a pilot group selected by Bilsa for reporting.)
Data sources:
• Bilsa system usage statistics (module-level log data)
• Surveys and feedback from teachers, administrators and parents
• Student achievement data (exam results, attendance, assessments)
• Reporting dashboards and decision-support outputs provided by Bilsa
Analysis process: Data were compared between a 2024 baseline and the final quarter of 2025; percentage changes, charts (time series), correlation analysis and thematic review of feedback were applied.
Below are headline findings for improvements across four dimensions (process efficiency, academic performance, administrative gains, satisfaction), with illustrative chart descriptions for each.
3.1 Process efficiency
• 80% of participating institutions reported significant time savings in student and teacher administration workflows.
• Lesson planning time: down by an average of 45%.
• Attendance and exam scheduling were digitised; manual processing errors fell by about 60%.
• In management reporting, decision speed increased by an average of 30%.
Chart 1: Process efficiency time series (2024 → 2025)
The table below shows percentage efficiency and increase rates by process area between 2024 and 2025.
| Process area | 2024 efficiency | 2025 efficiency | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student management | 45% | 90% | +45% |
| Lesson planning | 55% | 85% | +30% |
| Reporting | 35% | 95% | +60% |
3.2 Academic performance
• Term grade averages rose by about 12%.
• Bilsa’s performance monitoring and analytics helped teachers spot learning gaps early and arrange remedial support.
• Item-level and outcome analysis supported strategic planning for tests and exams.
Chart 2: Student averages (2024 and 2025)
The table below shows percentage increases in average grades by process area between 2024 and 2025.
| Process area | 2024 grade average | 2025 grade average | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student grade average | 80 | 95 | +12% |
3.3 Administrative gains
• Dashboards and reporting tools accelerated school leaders’ decision-making.
• Greater transparency in finance and accounting improved traceability; over 70% of respondents gave positive feedback.
• Payroll, extra-lesson and finance scheduling workloads became automated or semi-automated in Bilsa.
Chart 3: Administrative process efficiency (2024 → 2025)
The table below shows reductions in processing time (daily / weekly workload) between 2024 and 2025.
| Process type | 2024 processing time | 2025 processing time |
|---|---|---|
| Exam management | 120 | 100 |
| Financial operations | 100 | 80 |
| Payroll operations | 80 | 60 |
3.4 User satisfaction and experience
• Overall user satisfaction: 92%
• Teacher satisfaction: 88%
• Student and parent portal satisfaction: 90%
• Recurring themes in surveys: fast access to data, instant exam results, automated homework and attendance notifications.
Chart 4: User satisfaction distribution
The table below shows satisfaction rates (%) by category between 2024 and 2025.
| Category | Satisfaction (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 70 | Average satisfaction level |
| Teachers | 80 | High satisfaction with academic workflows |
| Students / parents | 90 | High satisfaction with access and communication |
| Lower-satisfaction group | 50 | Areas needing improvement plans |
• Early intervention: Bilsa’s analytics helped teachers spot weak areas early and support targeted remediation.
• Communication shift: The student–parent portal shared attendance, exam results and homework in near real time, increasing parent engagement and reducing gaps in communication.
• Administrative transparency: Finance, payroll and workload scheduling gave school leaders clearer visibility and more informed resource decisions.
• Building capacity: Some schools developed “system champion” teachers who ran internal training and accelerated adoption.
• Sustainability risks: Some institutions faced infrastructure limits (internet outages, slow servers) and user resistance; overall these issues tended to ease over time.
• Is ~80% improvement realistic? The headline “~80% improvement” is interpreted as a combined measure across process efficiency, academic outcomes, administrative gains and satisfaction. Not every area reached exactly 80%, but the composite trend approaches that level.
• Success factors: The student–parent portal improved engagement by sharing attendance, exams and homework in near real time.
1. Bilsa’s modular design (exams, attendance, timetabling, accounting) adapted flexibly to each institution.
2. Analytics and data-driven decision support gave leaders a strategic edge.
3. Training and technical support eased adoption.
• Risks and concerns:
• Some institutions still lack adequate internet or hardware.
• Data security and privacy—especially on the parent portal—must follow Bilsa’s protection policies strictly.
• User resistance: some teachers struggled with change initially, slowing full potential.
• Training and ongoing support: Expand the “system champion teacher” model for new customers and offer regular advanced training each year.
• Infrastructure investment: Institutions should prioritise network and server capacity; Bilsa may consider low-bandwidth or offline-capable features.
• Security and privacy: Raise standards for personal data, run audits and awareness campaigns.
• Advanced analytics: Full rollout of AI- and ML-assisted modules (where Bilsa is investing) could enable more personalised recommendations.
• Feedback loops: Keep improving the product through regular surveys and channels for teachers, students and parents.
• This is an analytical summary; real institution names, per-school performance and full chart detail may not be disclosed publicly for information security.
• The “~80% improvement” figure is a composite score from multiple metrics and may not apply equally to every institution.
• Surveys and user data rely partly on self-report, which can introduce bias.